Tzhebee
March 23rd, 2006, 04:06 PM
For those of you who missed the first round, you can find it Here (http://www.mysticwicks.com/showthread.php?t=113925).
My mom was supposed to go to court last week to have this whole #*%&^ing mess cleared up, but CPS pushed out the date again pending a police investigation. She got a letter yesterday from DSHS stating that she has been charged with 4th degree assault and under some WAC ruling, any charges must be thought of as "guilty" therefore, she is supspended AGAIN until a new case can come up. She is getting arrained on April 12.
She can once again argue and ask that the suspension be "stayed" but now she has to agrue against a separate set of WAC rules...one of which clearly states "Guilty until proven innocent". WTF...
What I don't understand, is how the investigating officer can have enough "evidence" to turn the case over to the procecuting attorney without ever even speaking to the child's father! OR informing or talking to ANY of the other parents!
My mom is stressed about money now and starting to question herself and if she is even a good person anymore. I read over these papers, and best I can see is...she's screwed. She can't prove herself innocent anymore than they can "prove" she's guilty (which she isn't)....but based on WAC code somethingorother...she's done.
Anyway...I was just hoping some of you could send her a little "pick me up" and best, fast outcome energies. She's a good woman...she didn't do this.
My mom was supposed to go to court last week to have this whole #*%&^ing mess cleared up, but CPS pushed out the date again pending a police investigation. She got a letter yesterday from DSHS stating that she has been charged with 4th degree assault and under some WAC ruling, any charges must be thought of as "guilty" therefore, she is supspended AGAIN until a new case can come up. She is getting arrained on April 12.
She can once again argue and ask that the suspension be "stayed" but now she has to agrue against a separate set of WAC rules...one of which clearly states "Guilty until proven innocent". WTF...
What I don't understand, is how the investigating officer can have enough "evidence" to turn the case over to the procecuting attorney without ever even speaking to the child's father! OR informing or talking to ANY of the other parents!
My mom is stressed about money now and starting to question herself and if she is even a good person anymore. I read over these papers, and best I can see is...she's screwed. She can't prove herself innocent anymore than they can "prove" she's guilty (which she isn't)....but based on WAC code somethingorother...she's done.
Anyway...I was just hoping some of you could send her a little "pick me up" and best, fast outcome energies. She's a good woman...she didn't do this.