PDA

View Full Version : Polytheism in Witchcraft



Arion
June 24th, 2006, 09:09 PM
Most Pagan Witches consider themselves to be polytheists, but are they really, and to what extent? I'm talking about all types of Pagan Witchcraft here: Wicca, Feri, Dianic, the offshoots of these, and any other tradition, including eclectics.

I'll use Wicca as an example; my understanding is that there is one Goddess and one God. Most traditions will use ancient god/dess names for these archetypes, but ultimately see them as just another name for THE Goddess and THE God. So we don't have multiple gods here, we just have two that can be known by a bunch of different names, but those names don't carry individual persons of their own.

Feri is a lot more polytheistic. The Star Goddess is the Creatrix and Mother of All things, she is beyond gender, she is all genders and all things. The many gods were born from her and there are an infinite number of them, but Feri itself focuses on 7 deities in particular, but is open to working with any others, My impression is that each of the gods are seen as distinct individuals, not as aspects of the Ultimate Source (Star Goddess), they are seperate beings, but lower on the divine hierarchy.

Then you have some of the eclectics who worship a particular pantheon, or many gods from different pantheons using a Witchcraft framework. They can range from soft polytheists to hard polytheists, seeing their gods as distinct or facets of a higher power.

I'd say that the majority of Witches see their gods os facets of One power. so is this really polytheism? They may use the gods as symbols, but not really worshiping them, worshiping instead more of a monotheistic-type Godform. The only hard hard polytheists I've encountered seem to be re-constructionists trying to re-establish old beliefs. Maybe living in a monotheistic society has made us less polytheistic.

Would you agree/disagree? How does your tradition view divinity? Would you say that Witchcraft is as polytheistic as we say it is?

shuvanilu
June 25th, 2006, 01:14 PM
I can't speak for others, but I am a soft polytheist Wiccan. But I have known many hard polytheists, and they are not all recons. I've definitely known hard polytheist Wiccans. I honestly don't think it would be very easy to figure out which view of Diety hold the majority. Around here, I feel like I've read more from the hard polytheists, actually. I feel like I'm in the minority holding onto that Dion Fortune addage "All Gods are One God, and all Goddesses are One Goddess, and there is One Initiator". My view of Diety tends to jive comfortably alongside the ideas of Joseph Cambell.---shuvanilu

Theres
June 25th, 2006, 01:28 PM
I'd say that the majority of Witches see their gods os facets of One power. so is this really polytheism? They may use the gods as symbols, but not really worshiping them, worshiping instead more of a monotheistic-type Godform. The only hard hard polytheists I've encountered seem to be re-constructionists trying to re-establish old beliefs. Maybe living in a monotheistic society has made us less polytheistic.

Would you agree/disagree? How does your tradition view divinity? Would you say that Witchcraft is as polytheistic as we say it is?

Hi, i'm Theres and i'm a hard polytheist and a witch.

however i do not consider myself a reconstructionist, although i couldn't really give you a proper label for what i do believe... possibly a 'Hellenic Classicist'?
but i do not see all the various god/desses as mere facets of some great deity, nor do believe in any single 'source' ('The One', 'The All', whatever) as anything more than a background canvas.

i've never been a monotheist, having come to my Pagan beliefs from an agnostic background, so the only influence monotheism has had on me is as a comparative belief system (and one that i can't really make any sense out of).

Morr
June 25th, 2006, 01:34 PM
I'm an Irish Recon.

I'm a hard polytheist.

All the Gods and Goddesses, from all cultures and mythologies are all seperate entities, unique on their own right.

I dont see them as all a diff aspect of THE God or THE Goddess.

Not at all.

PS -- I forgot to mention... I dont consider myself a witch though I have studied witchcraft and can do spells and energy work. However, I am very interested in Kitchen Witchery. So I guess you could call me a Kitchen Witch in training, or on the side :lol:

Toby Stimpson
June 25th, 2006, 03:40 PM
Well, I'd soemwhat agree with your analogies scott...but then there are a lot of witches who are not part of Paganism that view Gods as seperate and polytheistic entities. So I cant entirely agree. In Hinduism, as Im sure you know about that from me by now lol, there are many ideas...and in contrasting that with the Pagan side of me I think ultimatly its Monotheistic, but poltheisticly worshipped through.

Namaste

Tobias

David19
June 25th, 2006, 05:03 PM
I'm a 'hard' polytheist, and i believe that all the gods are individuals, I've heard of the Star goddess and i've read that the gods came from it/her/whatever, but are individuals, that's something i could believe but i just don't believe the gods are 'aspects' of other gods (like some might believe there only a few gods like one thunder god, one love god, etc that manifest in different cultures, which i don't believe, i don't think Hel and Kali are the same 'death' gods, or that Yahweh is the same as Zeus and Odin, etc, they're all seperate individuals, i haven't had many experiences, but it's just something i feel is right.

shuvanilu
June 25th, 2006, 06:19 PM
So, purplepanther, you're probably seeing exactly what I love about paganism. All of us who have replied to your post see the gods differently, and that's ok. No dogma. I even know pagans and witches who don't believe in gods as beings at all but as energies and forces. That's different than me, and that's cool:) ---shuvanilu

Sage Rainsong
June 25th, 2006, 06:37 PM
Would you agree/disagree? How does your tradition view divinity? Would you say that Witchcraft is as polytheistic as we say it is?

I would agree that a great deal of pagans are soft polytheists. I am not one but I think its fine. What bothers me is when people use the Gods as job descriptions and simplfy them as just a love goddess or a hunter god but that is a personal pet peeve of mine so, whatever (man I love that word). I tend to view the Gods as really really powerful spirits. I would like to point out that there are hard polytheists who are not recons. There are a lot of eclectic pagan non-wiccan (and possibly wiccan) polytheistic witches (hey that was long), and certain druid groups like ADF who are not strict recons.

Philosophia
June 25th, 2006, 08:18 PM
Would you agree/disagree? How does your tradition view divinity? Would you say that Witchcraft is as polytheistic as we say it is?

I'm a soft polytheist, but I'm a Dianic Eclectic Witch. :)

Arion
June 25th, 2006, 09:55 PM
So, purplepanther, you're probably seeing exactly what I love about paganism. All of us who have replied to your post see the gods differently, and that's ok. No dogma. I even know pagans and witches who don't believe in gods as beings at all but as energies and forces. That's different than me, and that's cool:) ---shuvanilu
You're absoultely right, we each have our own views, and that's what makes Paganism such a personal take on religion. Diversity is a beautiful thing :)



I would agree that a great deal of pagans are soft polytheists. I am not one but I think its fine. What bothers me is when people use the Gods as job descriptions and simplfy them as just a love goddess or a hunter god but that is a personal pet peeve of mine so, whatever (man I love that word).
OMG yes, it bothers the hell out of me too. If anyone has read any of my posts on Aphrodite, you see how annoyed I get when she is described simply as a love goddess or "personification" of love. Ugh, drives me nuts.

Hellenic_Witch
June 26th, 2006, 08:13 PM
however i do not consider myself a reconstructionist, although i couldn't really give you a proper label for what i do believe... possibly a 'Hellenic Classicist'?

"Hellenic Classicist"......I LOVE that!!

I'm a hard polytheist as well and believe that each god and goddess are their own complete beings, and are not merely facets of a larger god or goddess.

I am not Wiccan. I'm a Pagan who honors and follows mainly Hekate, but I attempt to learn about, meditate on, and honor other Greek deities fron time to time, as well.

I can't say I'm a reconstructionist, because my practice is not that structured, but I take what you might call an academic approach to my spiritual path, attempting to go back to the earliest sources and verify what I learn (as much as I can) before I incorporate it into the framework of my path.

Ben Gruagach
June 28th, 2006, 02:38 PM
I see witchcraft as a practice because there are lots of very different religions that all consider themselves to be witchcraft. There are monotheistic witches, duotheistic witches, soft polytheistic witches, hard polytheistic witches, and even atheist witches.

Wiccans are just one type of witch and are hardly the only type out there. There are witches in other parts of the world who probably have never heard of Wicca let alone Gerald Gardner and the people he inspired. And there were certainly witches long before Gerald Gardner's time, many who probably never heard the word Wicca or Wiccan throughout their lives.

So I think it's a bit misleading to try and make a blanket statement like witches are polytheists because while some certainly are there are also some who most definitely aren't.

Arion
June 29th, 2006, 11:40 AM
Wiccans are just one type of witch and are hardly the only type out there. There are witches in other parts of the world who probably have never heard of Wicca let alone Gerald Gardner and the people he inspired. And there were certainly witches long before Gerald Gardner's time, many who probably never heard the word Wicca or Wiccan throughout their lives.

So I think it's a bit misleading to try and make a blanket statement like witches are polytheists because while some certainly are there are also some who most definitely aren't.
Like I said in my original post, I was referring to all Pagan Witchcraft, not just Wicca, but Feri, Dianic, eclectics, and anything else.

Ben Gruagach
June 29th, 2006, 11:47 AM
Like I said in my original post, I was referring to all Pagan Witchcraft, not just Wicca, but Feri, Dianic, eclectics, and anything else.

Lots of people miss that point so I thought it was worth repeating. (And also because the list of Witch types you provided are pretty much only English-speaking forms of Witchcraft, and left out non-Pagan Witches too...)

AkashaW
June 29th, 2006, 05:13 PM
Most Pagan Witches consider themselves to be polytheists, but are they really, and to what extent? I'm talking about all types of Pagan Witchcraft here: Wicca, Feri, Dianic, the offshoots of these, and any other tradition, including eclectics.

I'll use Wicca as an example; my understanding is that there is one Goddess and one God. Most traditions will use ancient god/dess names for these archetypes, but ultimately see them as just another name for THE Goddess and THE God. So we don't have multiple gods here, we just have two that can be known by a bunch of different names, but those names don't carry individual persons of their own.

Feri is a lot more polytheistic. The Star Goddess is the Creatrix and Mother of All things, she is beyond gender, she is all genders and all things. The many gods were born from her and there are an infinite number of them, but Feri itself focuses on 7 deities in particular, but is open to working with any others, My impression is that each of the gods are seen as distinct individuals, not as aspects of the Ultimate Source (Star Goddess), they are seperate beings, but lower on the divine hierarchy.

Then you have some of the eclectics who worship a particular pantheon, or many gods from different pantheons using a Witchcraft framework. They can range from soft polytheists to hard polytheists, seeing their gods as distinct or facets of a higher power.

I'd say that the majority of Witches see their gods os facets of One power. so is this really polytheism? They may use the gods as symbols, but not really worshiping them, worshiping instead more of a monotheistic-type Godform. The only hard hard polytheists I've encountered seem to be re-constructionists trying to re-establish old beliefs. Maybe living in a monotheistic society has made us less polytheistic.

Would you agree/disagree? How does your tradition view divinity? Would you say that Witchcraft is as polytheistic as we say it is?

Well, first off I'll say that I disagree with the idea that Wicca is separate from Witchcraft. By my training and in my definition, these are the same thing, so for anyone who uses these terms differently - I ask kindly that you please state what differences you see between the two when answering this question. otherwise, I get confused. Thanks in advance:fpraise: .

Now to my own answer - there's not a lot I can say specifically about what my Tradition believes. I'm Gardnerian and these details are considered oathbound. Personally, I don't think it's an either/or proposition. IMO - yes, there is One Source of divinity - and that's the whole of everything in all the universes. It's kind of a "the whole is greater than the sum of the parts" thing. Therefore, with that in mind, all Gods, all people, all spirits are ultimately part of the same Consciousness.

That said, however, we do not exist in that moment of Eternity. We exist in Time. Therefore, we have what Joseph Campbell liked to call the illusion of separation - which is both real and not real at the same time. So, yes, all Gods, spirits, and other entities (including us) are separate, self-aware individuals with their own personalities and their own agendas, likes, dislikes, purposes, etc.

To hold a non-dualistic view like this is difficult, but when it comes to how one deals with one's relationship with the Gods - as I said, we don't (can't for more than a few moments at a time) exist in Eternity without losing our individuality. I realize that's the goal of some Eastern religions, but IMO, it's NOT the goal of The Craft. Therefore, for all practical purposes, and for the truth of our interactions with Them (since it's impossible in a real-world sense to ritually interact with oneself - which would NOT be the same thing as practicing Solitary) - They are all as separate and individual as each one of us is. All God/desses are not One God/dess anymore than All People are One Person - except, as I said in the beginning, all things are One Thing.

Any heads hurting yet?:hahugh:

Theres
June 29th, 2006, 07:13 PM
Well, first off I'll say that I disagree with the idea that Wicca is separate from Witchcraft. By my training and in my definition, these are the same thing...
i'm curious as to how you think an agnostic witch would feel about this statement.

i will agree that you can't take the witchcraft out of Wicca, but i do not believe that the reverse holds true. perhaps i misunderstood?

AkashaW
June 29th, 2006, 09:42 PM
i'm curious as to how you think an agnostic witch would feel about this statement.

i will agree that you can't take the witchcraft out of Wicca, but i do not believe that the reverse holds true. perhaps i misunderstood?

You'll have to define your terms. I don't know what YOU mean by "wicca" or "witchcraft." Since, as I said, to me the words are synonymous, I have no idea how one would take one "out of" the other. Nor do I have any idea how an agnostic witch would feel.

I DID ask people to please define their terms for me.

Theres
June 30th, 2006, 12:24 AM
nah... nevermind.

Ben Gruagach
June 30th, 2006, 08:28 AM
I'm with Theres.

If Wicca=Witchcraft and Witchcraft=Wicca then all witches are Wiccans. And if that's the case, why are Gardnerians in particular always so upset when non-Gardnerians call themselves Wiccans?

AkashaW
June 30th, 2006, 02:00 PM
I'm with Theres.

If Wicca=Witchcraft and Witchcraft=Wicca then all witches are Wiccans. And if that's the case, why are Gardnerians in particular always so upset when non-Gardnerians call themselves Wiccans?

Since I'm Gardnerian and I don't know ANY Gardnerians who get upset when non-Gardnerians call themselves Wiccan, I have no answer to that. And just for the record, I don't know of any Gardnerians who get upset when others call themselves Witches, either. In fact, one very learned HP once said that "Gardnerian is the modifier of the term Witch."

If you could give me some names of Gardnerians who've said these things....?

Arion
June 30th, 2006, 06:21 PM
The Wicca vs. Witchcraft debate has been analyzed to death in other threads...

David19
July 1st, 2006, 07:39 AM
The Wicca vs. Witchcraft debate has been analyzed to death in other threads...

I agree with you, i think there are lots of other threads for that debate.

Gede
July 4th, 2006, 04:21 AM
Khaire & Blessings

Gede
July 4th, 2006, 04:25 AM
Khaire & Blessings~
I always find discussions about one's opinion/experience conerning the nature of Deity to be extremely fascinating. I have come to the assertion or rather conclusion that the Gods care not so much of how we see them, only that we do. In saying that I am a hard polytheist as I have experienced my Gods in both collective and indepedent circumstances and as each of us is connected to the generic human gene as a species, we are also independent of one another. I am not a reconstructionist, however I do perform reconstructed versions of Hellenic rituals in my devotions because they work for me and because a half of my deities can be described as "Hellenic". Other than that I am divinely-inspirational, going with the flow and keep with the traditions and custom that arise from gnosis and intuition. Woot Woot!

Namaste*

AkashaW
July 4th, 2006, 09:16 AM
The Wicca vs. Witchcraft debate has been analyzed to death in other threads...

Which is why I asked people to define their terms - as I did - so that we wouldn't waste bandwidth trying to determine who's right or arguing over semantics. I do apologize that my response seems to have caused others to feel the need to argue my definition.

Renny
July 4th, 2006, 09:30 AM
Hi, i'm Theres and i'm a hard polytheist and a witch.

however i do not consider myself a reconstructionist, although i couldn't really give you a proper label for what i do believe... possibly a 'Hellenic Classicist'?
but i do not see all the various god/desses as mere facets of some great deity, nor do believe in any single 'source' ('The One', 'The All', whatever) as anything more than a background canvas.

i've never been a monotheist, having come to my Pagan beliefs from an agnostic background, so the only influence monotheism has had on me is as a comparative belief system (and one that i can't really make any sense out of).



I think I am the Norse pagan version of you ^_^

Dawa Lhamo
July 4th, 2006, 11:32 AM
I'm Wiccan, and I'm a polytheist. Leaning towards hard polytheism. I think there's an Essence which permeates everything, but I don't think it is personified or anything. It's more the energetic matrix upon which things manifest. Honestly I don't concern myself much with it.

For me, the Gods are all as individual as we are. And the God and Goddess of Wicca are individual Gods, among the Gods, metaphysically... obviously, to me, their place is above the others... Or perhaps nearer to me than the others is a better description... But there's none of that Gods being aspects of my God thing. Personally, I don't like that kind of theology.

Gods are *complete* individuals, too, with all sorts of layers and idiosyncracies and such.... They're just a lot bigger and can do a lot more things than I can. ^_^ They're on a different level, but they're still as individual from each other as we humans are from each other.

I really agree that the Gods aren't just "God of thunder" "God of the sea" "Goddess of love" etc... I think that kind of 2D representation is a *misrepresentation* of the way our ancestors conceived of their Gods.

Obviously, this is all my opinion. There does seem to be a trend of soft polytheism or modified monotheism in some Pagan circles, but honestly, if it works for them, then it works for them. Who am I to naysay?