RainInanna
September 2nd, 2008, 07:41 PM
Hi, my name is Rain, and I just totally had a brain jolt due to another discussion. I'm sorry if the result here is disjointed but I want to spit some thoughts out and see what develops.
It suddenly occurred to me, due to that other discussion, that perhaps some misunderstanding of how one can be Goddess-centered results from misunderstanding and confusion over gender and sex specific terms.
Specifically, I think people have differing opinions of what identifies male and female, masculine and feminine, and how these can be applied to the Divine. When the terms are used interchangeably or indiscriminately, they may force the Divine into boundaries that may not apply after all.
Let me try to explain from my view:
For my purposes, the terms male and female refer to biological elements of one's sex - reproductive organs.
God and Goddess, when applied to deities, mark them as either male or female.
However, I don't see the deities as having genitals - I don't see them as being male or female. I don't imagine they have biological sex either. So reproductive organs are just not a part of the Divine as I envision it. Therefore, the terms male and female do not apply to the Sacred*. Therefore, the terms God and Goddess do not apply to the Sacred.
What??? Yes, I said it. To me the terms God and Goddess do not define the Sacred. So why say Goddess-centered at all?
The term Goddess can refer to women as manifestations of the Sacred who have female body parts. So I see that it is valid to be Goddess-centered even as I don't apply "male" or "female" to the Divine. I refer, with Goddess-centered, to spirituality that is of and for women. I use Goddess-centered as an adjective to define the spirituality, not to define the Goddess.
I respect that women (such as myself) feel a deep desire to connect with a Sacred form that is like them - that would have female body parts, that would be recognized as female, that are referred to as "she", even as I recognize my view of the Divine is that it transcends body parts.
I suggest that the term Goddess defines human understanding, not the Divine. That when we say Goddess we can simultaneously believe the Divine transcends the female term while establishing connection with that part of the Divine that manifests in our female bodies. That the word Goddess does not define the Sacred at all for us, but is simply one facet of the whole diamond we recognize as Divine. That we use it as a convenient word simply to refer to something we know transcends words and human constructs.
Ok, thoughts welcome, I'm going to wander off and ruminate on this one some more.
In the meantime, with the usual caveat that I recognize Wikipedia is not the be all and end all of resource material, I still referred to these links for several of the concepts, ideas, and terms used above:
Biology of gender (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_of_gender)
Gender (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender)
Masculinity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masculine)
Femininity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Femininity)
*Noting the usual caveat - statements I make must necessarily be understood as from my point of view, which I do not insist is right, correct, or the only view. Hell I don't even necessarily think I know what I'm talking about, so don't think I'm trying to say "this is the only right way to see it" at any time I make any statement whatsoever.
It suddenly occurred to me, due to that other discussion, that perhaps some misunderstanding of how one can be Goddess-centered results from misunderstanding and confusion over gender and sex specific terms.
Specifically, I think people have differing opinions of what identifies male and female, masculine and feminine, and how these can be applied to the Divine. When the terms are used interchangeably or indiscriminately, they may force the Divine into boundaries that may not apply after all.
Let me try to explain from my view:
For my purposes, the terms male and female refer to biological elements of one's sex - reproductive organs.
God and Goddess, when applied to deities, mark them as either male or female.
However, I don't see the deities as having genitals - I don't see them as being male or female. I don't imagine they have biological sex either. So reproductive organs are just not a part of the Divine as I envision it. Therefore, the terms male and female do not apply to the Sacred*. Therefore, the terms God and Goddess do not apply to the Sacred.
What??? Yes, I said it. To me the terms God and Goddess do not define the Sacred. So why say Goddess-centered at all?
The term Goddess can refer to women as manifestations of the Sacred who have female body parts. So I see that it is valid to be Goddess-centered even as I don't apply "male" or "female" to the Divine. I refer, with Goddess-centered, to spirituality that is of and for women. I use Goddess-centered as an adjective to define the spirituality, not to define the Goddess.
I respect that women (such as myself) feel a deep desire to connect with a Sacred form that is like them - that would have female body parts, that would be recognized as female, that are referred to as "she", even as I recognize my view of the Divine is that it transcends body parts.
I suggest that the term Goddess defines human understanding, not the Divine. That when we say Goddess we can simultaneously believe the Divine transcends the female term while establishing connection with that part of the Divine that manifests in our female bodies. That the word Goddess does not define the Sacred at all for us, but is simply one facet of the whole diamond we recognize as Divine. That we use it as a convenient word simply to refer to something we know transcends words and human constructs.
Ok, thoughts welcome, I'm going to wander off and ruminate on this one some more.
In the meantime, with the usual caveat that I recognize Wikipedia is not the be all and end all of resource material, I still referred to these links for several of the concepts, ideas, and terms used above:
Biology of gender (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_of_gender)
Gender (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender)
Masculinity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masculine)
Femininity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Femininity)
*Noting the usual caveat - statements I make must necessarily be understood as from my point of view, which I do not insist is right, correct, or the only view. Hell I don't even necessarily think I know what I'm talking about, so don't think I'm trying to say "this is the only right way to see it" at any time I make any statement whatsoever.