PDA

View Full Version : Lesson 1 - The History of Tarot



Amethyst Rose
December 15th, 2004, 01:50 PM
The History of Tarot

There are so many misconceptions about the origin of Tarot cards, that it's difficult to separate the myth from fact. Different books will give different explinations, so what I'm going to present here is what I believe, through the readings of many books, to be as close to the truth as I can get. One thing to keep in mind, that all books have in common, is that the history of Tarot isn't known, for certain - there's a lot of speculation and a lot of it has been romanticized.

A very common belief that you may have heard is that the Tarot originally came from Egypt, and was brought to Europe by the Gypsies. One popular book, The Everything Tarot Book, by M. J. Abadie, states that:

"One theory is that in the great library of Alexandria in Egypt, whose female librarian Hypatia was world-renowned for her wisdom and learning, there existed scrolls (which was how books were made in those days) containing all of the wisdom of the ancient world.

One of these "books" was supposedly based on the legendary Book of Thoth, derived from the mystery schools of Egypt. The allegorical illustrations on the Tarot cards are said to contain these secret teachings, which in the Major Arcana represent a course in personal development. The esoteric teachings were hidden in the seemingly innocent pictures."

While this seems like a very romantic notion, for the cards certainly do tell a lesson in personal development, further study has shown me that this belief is false, but it does has it's own history, which I'll get into shortly.

According to Cynthia Giles' book, The Tarot, History, Mystery and Lore, Tarot cards originated in Italy and Spain, in the 14th century. Indeed, the first mention of Tarot cards is in a 14th Century lecture against their use. Tarot cards are an early form of todays playing cards, originally used to play a game called tarocchi (http://www.pagat.com/tarot/ottocen.html). As such, they first appeared in Italy under the name Tarocco, Taroc or Tarocchi Cards. A facsimilie of one of the earliest decks, created in the 15th century, called the Visconti Sforza Tarocci Deck, is still available today, and you can see images of it here: http://www.tarot-decks.com/visconti-sforza.html

So, the next logical question is how did the Tarot cards move from their humble beginning as simple playing cards, to the more esoteric tool of Divination? For that we can thank Antoine Court de Gebelen, (1725-84). In the late 1700's, de Gebelen was a member of a secret society of occultists, and was greatly influenced by Egyptian thought. The story is that he saw the game of tarocchi being played and saw in the cards a vast amount of symbolism which he attributed to ancient Egyptian lore. The deck he saw at the time was the Marseilles type, which had evolved and changed from the Visconti-Sforza deck. It is speculated that the changes in the cards occured when members of a secret society put occult symbols and artwork into the cards. De Geblen didn't realize that the cards he saw weren't the origninal cards, and so when he wrote his treatise, "Le Monde Primitif", which was the start of written works about the secret meanings of tarot cards, he was writing about the modified tarot. It is from his treatise that all the common misconceptions relating the tarot to Egypt stem from. (I encourage you to do a Google search on his treatise, if you want more information on it.)

Soon, the idea that the cards had meaning, and could be used to tell those meanings (divination!) spread. In 1783 Etteilla published a book with his own meanings of the cards and the popularity of tarot as a divination tool grew. While de Geblin had noted that there were 22 trumps and 22 letters in the Hebrew language, in the 19th century, Eliphas Levi Zahed took that correlation further and tied the tarot into the Tree of Life and the Kabalah. This is when the Tarot really began to take of as an occult tool.

The decks which influence us the most in the twentieth century, are the decks from the late 1800's created by the followers of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. The Golden Dawn was started in England by three men: Wescott, Woodford and Woodman. The Golden Down became a very intense and influential occult group. Much of this is to the credit of S. Liddel mathers who wrote a treatise on the tarot. He contributed much of the ritual material and philosophy that is the basis of what is used for the tarot today. He also brought all the systems together with the tarot -- the kabalah, astrology, numerology and magick.

There are two men who were members of the Golden Dawn who contributed the most to the tarot decks in use today. Arthur Edward Waite and Aleister Crowley. Crowley was a protegee of Mathers and his deck was the Book of Thoth, which is intensely involved in symbolism. Waite's deck, however, has a storytelling type of theme so that each card has a story to tell. These cards are considered to be the cornerstone of many of the decks that are used now for divination.

The next big leap in tarot occured in North America in the 1920s when Paul Foster Case, an innitiate of the Golden Dawn in New york, created the BOTA deck. The BOTA deck is in black and white so that you can color them in yourself. This follows the Golden Dawn tradition which was that each member had to make their own deck as a part of their training. His group, B.O.T.A (Builders of the Adytum) still has a correspondence course for the tarot. What followed was a rash of Waite/Crowley copies with wonderful artwork.

So that is the History of Tarot, and I'll end this first lesson here. The next lesson will be on the uses of tarot and common misconceptions.

Oh, and any questions and discussion can be put in this thread.

Dashifen
December 15th, 2004, 08:10 PM
Here's a question for you: you said the Waite-based decks have cards that tell a story and Crowley-based decks are more symbolic. However, if the Waite-based decks use pictures to tell their stories, how are these pictures not symbols? Or, is it simply that Crowley-based decks are symbols without an accompanying story while Waite-based decks have both symbols and stories?

:hmmmmm:

Blessings,
~D~

Aidron
December 15th, 2004, 08:29 PM
Here's a question for you: you said the Waite-based decks have cards that tell a story and Crowley-based decks are more symbolic. However, if the Waite-based decks use pictures to tell their stories, how are these pictures not symbols? Or, is it simply that Crowley-based decks are symbols without an accompanying story while Waite-based decks have both symbols and stories?

:hmmmmm:

Blessings,
~D~


I am not familiar with the Thoth deck beyond reading a few reviews and seeing a few sample images online, and I do not recall any of the pips, but I'm assuming if it is based as a symbolic deck then its minor arcana merely has a representation displayed. For example, the Six of Swords would simply have six swords arranged in some fashion perhaps with a bit of symbolism surrounding them or none at all.

The Rider-Waite deck, on the other hand, tells a story through each of its minor arcana. Again, I'm not familiar with that one, but its style is similar to my own deck, the Celtic Dragon. In the Six of Swords (Celtic Dragon) you see a woman standing beside a dragon with six swords being carried in a holster by the dragon (I believe the dragon) while looking at a castle off in the distance.

Does that offer the clarity you needed?

Dashifen
December 15th, 2004, 08:37 PM
Ah. Yes, that helps. I recall seeing a few decks in my time that worked that way. Not many mind you, but a few. Thanks!

halfwaynowhere
December 15th, 2004, 08:40 PM
the pictures in both decks are symbolic, however, the pictures in the waite-based decks are symbolic through telling a story, while the crowley-based decks are just symbolic as to how many swords or whatever are shown on that card, sometmes the way they are arranged in the image are enough to tell what the card means...

Dashifen
December 15th, 2004, 08:48 PM
Schwing! Thoth deck picture (http://www.astroamerica.com/t-toth.html). Couldn't get aeclectic.net to work tonight but found pictures from the Crowley Thoth deck at that site. Now I see more of what you mean since that site shows a few of the minor arcana as well as the majors. Just thought I'd share.

Amethyst Rose
December 15th, 2004, 11:25 PM
You guys answered the question before I could. :) Good job!

Anubis RainHawk
December 15th, 2004, 11:48 PM
Amethyst Rose, you mentioned 2 possible origins, Egypt and Europe. I'm curious about other believed origns. I remember reading that they might have originated from Atlantis. So what are other opitions on the origins on the tarot?

Anubis RainHawk

Anubis RainHawk
December 15th, 2004, 11:57 PM
What's the difference in the Crowley and Waite symbolism? I've head that the Crowley deck is "deeper" than most decks, and so it's not recommeneded for the beginner. What are your thoughts?

Anubis RainHawk

Dashifen
December 16th, 2004, 09:36 AM
I've heard, too, that they originated in Atlantis. 'Course, since we only have Plato as a source for Atlantis an no other archeological evidence for the lost continent, we'll have to take that with a grain of salt. The history that I heard concerning Atlantis is similar, almost extactly so, to the Egypt option above. The story goes that sages from around the world met in the Moroccan city of Fez. There, they realized that the knowledge and power they held -- which was reported to be passed to them from Atlantis -- would be lost to the ages unless they did something. Plus, they knew that if they simply provided the teaching of Atlantis to the people at large (a) few would understand and (b) many would abuse their knowledge. So, they made pictures that described the teaching and placed this pictures on the playing cards which were then printed and circulated around the north Africa. The date in my tarot book puts this around 1200 AD if I remember correctly. My source is an essay by Rachael Pollack which is included in the front of the acccompanying book with the Vertigo Tarot.

Amethyst Rose
December 16th, 2004, 12:24 PM
Amethyst Rose, you mentioned 2 possible origins, Egypt and Europe. I'm curious about other believed origns. I remember reading that they might have originated from Atlantis. So what are other opitions on the origins on the tarot?

Anubis RainHawk

Here's a page that briefly goes over the other theories of where the Tarot originated. I didn't include them in my history lesson, because I don't believe that's where they came from. :)

http://www.allsands.com/Religious/NewAge/historyoftarot_xjd_gn.htm

Amethyst Rose
December 16th, 2004, 12:27 PM
What's the difference in the Crowley and Waite symbolism? I've head that the Crowley deck is "deeper" than most decks, and so it's not recommeneded for the beginner. What are your thoughts?

Anubis RainHawk

I agree. It's easier to read a Waite based deck because the meaning of the card is in the story. You can look at the pictures and symbolism and put it all together to make a story, which tells you what the card means. While Crowley decks simply have simbolism with no story. So to understand the meanings of Crowley decks you have to be versed in symbolism, and understand the meanings of the cards better than you have to with a Waite deck. It'd be difficult to pick up a Crowley deck for your first time reading and read it accurately, in my opinion.

Wiccamagikal
December 16th, 2004, 11:07 PM
Wow, This was really informative, I did not know..any of this before. Although, I have many times heard of Mr.Crowley (and have read some of his work). I really wish I had a tarot deck of any kind. I cant wait to get one. I..oddly enough have no questions about this lesson as of yet.
Thanks!

LadyAutumnCat
December 30th, 2004, 06:01 PM
I have a question on understanding the symbolism of the cards. When I do readings for myself I keep the interpretation book handy and find that most of the time I'm interpreting them the same way as the book is, however, isn't symbolism subjective? What I interpret as positive could be negative to someone else. Does this ultimately affect reading accuracy?

Amethyst Rose
December 30th, 2004, 11:49 PM
I have a question on understanding the symbolism of the cards. When I do readings for myself I keep the interpretation book handy and find that most of the time I'm interpreting them the same way as the book is, however, isn't symbolism subjective? What I interpret as positive could be negative to someone else. Does this ultimately affect reading accuracy?

While there is some symbolism that nearly always means the same thing -- colors, numbers, animals, to name a few -- it really helps to learn the standard interpretation of the symbols as the author of the deck intended them to be. If your instinct tells you differently, then fine, but I wouldn't say that the color red means anger, when the author intended it to mean passion or love. Does that make sense?
This is difficult to answer because if you saw the symbolism on the 3 of swords to be happiness and accomplishment, you'd just be wrong. :)
I think that's why it's important to read the LWB, because it often gives the interpretations of the author to help you read the deck more effectively.

Aidron
December 31st, 2004, 12:02 AM
While there is some symbolism that nearly always means the same thing -- colors, numbers, animals, to name a few -- it really helps to learn the standard interpretation of the symbols as the author of the deck intended them to be. If your instinct tells you differently, then fine, but I wouldn't say that the color red means anger, when the author intended it to mean passion or love. Does that make sense?
This is difficult to answer because if you saw the symbolism on the 3 of swords to be happiness and accomplishment, you'd just be wrong. :)
I think that's why it's important to read the LWB, because it often gives the interpretations of the author to help you read the deck more effectively.


Do you feel, as I do, that the tarot, regardless of which card reflects what, will somehow resonate with each of us basic principles in our life? The Three of Swords for example is often denoted as representing discord, strife, malevolence, and unbridled rage. Symbols I associate with that would of course be fire and the color red. Cross the globe to China, however, where red represents prosperity, and if the card was based sheerly on symbolism as opposed to the Rider-Waite style, would they not interpret it differently if a lot of red was included?

Would they in turn also not find the meanings the Three of Swords traditionally represent in another card, something more reflective of their own symbolism?

Granted, they would be wrong from a traditional stand point (as far as I know), but at the same time would it really matter?

I find it useful to learn the traditoinal meanings, but there are some cards which I remain absolutely adamant about in terms of how they unlock my own psyche and downright shun traditional associations to various degrees. I suppose my point is that sometimes traditoinal symbolism can hinder us more than help us at times, especially if you see within a certain card something different from its traditional meaning, no doubt resulting in an inner-struggle relating to that card.

Amethyst Rose
December 31st, 2004, 12:16 AM
I think that the cards can compensate for our own interpretations of them... the same way they can compensate for the loss of a card. That's why intuition is so important. If your intuition tells you it means something, then it means something, no matter what the LWB or symbolism tells you.
However, I do think it is important to be aware of what the author intended to interpret in his/her deck, because that is how the cards were designed to be used. The only comparison I can think of right now (cuz it's past my bed time) is someone wearing a pair of underwear on their head. They may keep your head warm, but that's now what they were designed to do. :)

Aidron
January 1st, 2005, 05:46 AM
I think that the cards can compensate for our own interpretations of them... the same way they can compensate for the loss of a card. That's why intuition is so important. If your intuition tells you it means something, then it means something, no matter what the LWB or symbolism tells you.
However, I do think it is important to be aware of what the author intended to interpret in his/her deck, because that is how the cards were designed to be used. The only comparison I can think of right now (cuz it's past my bed time) is someone wearing a pair of underwear on their head. They may keep your head warm, but that's now what they were designed to do. :)


I completely agree. I find in researching the card's intended use I come up with my own insights that may be vastly different from the author's. Similar to those pictures you see where one might see a chalice and the other might see two people's faces, or one person might see an old woman and the other a beautiful woman. Same image, but we register it differently in our minds.

*walks off with a pair of underwear on his head* :D

Amethyst Rose
January 3rd, 2005, 12:43 AM
*walks off with a pair of underwear on his head* :D

:lol: You're a nut.

PeatBog
June 21st, 2006, 11:51 AM
Though the earliest extant tarot cards are from 15th century northern Italy (the Visconti cards), it's possible that the gypsies brought them from Persia (on their travel route from India) where there were gnostic sects. The gypsies arrived in Rome about 1422, and the Visconti cards were drawn in the 1440s. However, Islam discourages images of humans and animals. Another theory is that Godfrey de Bouillon, leader of the Knights Templar, brought them back from the Middle East after the last crusades in the 13th century. Yet another theory is that the gnostic Albigensians originated the tarot in 14th century France. The hard evidence (Visconti tarots) points to 15th century Italy as the origin of tarot. (But I'm not quite as sure most people that the earliest extant cards are, in fact, the earliest. Playing cards were in Europe by the late 14th century, so there may have been tarot cards, held in privacy, during that time.)