PDA

View Full Version : Auras and TR



Kotake
February 18th, 2005, 05:31 PM
I was at this alternative fair today (link (http://www.whatsonwhen.com/events/~90766.jml)). There were some shamans, some Tarot readers, some herbalists, some healers, and a lot of so-called New Agey items and people.

What caught my curiosity were the numerous stands which had what they called "aura photo cameras". As I have never fully understood the concept behind auras, I talked to one of these "aura photographers".

He failed to tell me exactly what the apparatus he was using was, and how it worked. Furthermore, I asked him how he defined auras. He did't know what I meant. I asked what this energy that is seemingly recorded by the "aura camera" is, and he said that it was radiation coming from ourselves. He referred to the warmth that we are emitting and exemplified it with showing that we can feel a hand is warm. I asked if he meant thermal radiation, as that is what causes us to have warm hands. He persistently said no, yet I tried to insist that what he was talking about seemed like thermal radiation to me.

I asked if the aura photographer meant other forms of electromagnetic radiation if not thermal, but he said that it wasn't that sort of radiation. Fair enough, if he means a metaphoric sort of radiation, being not electromagnetic. But as mentioned, I was confused by the fact that he said auras had something to do with us sending out heat (i.e. thermal radiation).

This person was Danish, so perhaps we might have misunderstood each other to some point. Yet from how I understood it, his explanations were not very consistent.

I suppose there are some of you here who have ideas about auras, so maybe you could explain to me what kind of "radiation" they are.

Rick
February 18th, 2005, 06:07 PM
Auras are, pure & simple, the body's electromagnetic field. They are physically there, & can be measured. One can learn to see them (it's all about figuring out just exactly what your looking at).

Wolfie Girl
February 18th, 2005, 10:47 PM
I'm not too sure about the aura photos. I know you can see them, I can. Pohtographs? I don't know
^..^

Kotake
February 21st, 2005, 02:05 PM
Auras are, pure & simple, the body's electromagnetic field. They are physically there, & can be measured. One can learn to see them (it's all about figuring out just exactly what your looking at).So that includes all wavelengths emitted, right? But humans emit infrared/thermal radiation and tera radiation, and as far as I know -- I may of course be mistaken -- we don't emit much visible light, if any at all. So what is the reason we are able to see different colours in auras?

Tabbykitty
February 23rd, 2005, 09:10 PM
say... when you had ur photo taken, did you have to put your both hands on some kinda metal plate? There are aura cameras where I live, cos aura photography is quite popular among local crystal collectors. The shutter camera itself doesnt actually capture the auric field, its the metal plates that do that. An image of your energy field is then superimposed on your photo, which is usually some kinda polaroid.

Kotake
February 27th, 2005, 07:40 PM
Thank you, Tabbykitty, that made me thinking, and I found this site (http://www.stephanyhurkos.com/aura.htm) about aura photography:

Aura photography is a visual image of how we are functioning.

The technological process is complicated. The hand-shaped plates are sophisticated sensors. They measure your electromagnetic field, based on the Ayurvedic (acupressure points on the hand) system of meridians. The camera codes the energy readings into frequencies (which correspond to certain colors) and process the photograph, a computer sorts the information and prints the Aura Photograph.

These measurements are expressed as vibrational levels which a computer chip turns into their relevant colors. A data cable from the sensor takes the information to the camera which takes a double exposure (your image plus superimposing of colors collected from the sensors). This amazing photograph of all the collected data superimposed on the image is the Aura photo.
And I found this about Kirlian photography (http://skepdic.com/kirlian.html), which seems to be the process behind the energy field "photo".

I looked further and found some more info on Kirlian photography here [link (http://www.cannylink.com/Photographykirlien.htm)].
Now, one (http://www.geocities.com/lemagicien_2000/kfpage/kf.html) of the sites linked to in the above link states this:


Also the luminous halo around the object has nothing to do with the AURA, it's just a particular type of electrical discharge... so: no AURA please!!!Which I find confusing. This person claims that the colours detected by Kirlian cameras are not the auras.
What does this tell us? Is Kirlian photography not the technique behind aura cameras after all? Or does this person simply reject the existence of auras?